Original Article
Direct In Vitro Shoot Regeneration from Spindle Leaf Roll Segments of Sugarcane
Year: 2021 | Month: September | Volume 14 | Issue 3
1.Cheema, K.L. and Hussain, M. 2004. Micropropagation of Sugarcane Through Apical Bud and Axillary Bud. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 6: 257-259
View at Google Scholar2.Conger, B.V., Hanning, G.E., Gray, D.J. and McDaniel, J.K. 1983. Direct embryogenesis from mesophyll cells of orchard grass. Sci., 221: 850–851.
View at Google Scholar3.Dijak, M. and Brown, D.C.W. 1987. Patterns of direct and indirect embryogenesis from mesophyll protoplasts of Medicago sativa. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 9: 121–130.
View at Google Scholar4.Desai, N.S., Suprasanna, P. and Bapat, V.A. 2004. Simple and reproducible protocol for direct somatic embryogenesis from cultured immature inflorescence segments of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Curr. Sci., 87: 764–768.
View at Google Scholar5.Gill, R., Malhotra, P.K. and Gosal, S.S. 2005. Direct plant regeneration from cultured young leaf segments of sugarcane. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 84: 227–231.
View at Google Scholar6.Kalunke, R.M., Kolge, A.M., Babu, K.H. and Prasad, D.T. 2009. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of sugarcane for borer resistance using Cry 1Aa 3 gene and one step regeneration of transgenic plants. Sugar Tech., 11: 355–359.
View at Google Scholar7.Kaur, A. and Sandhu, J.S. 2015. High throughput in vitro micropropagation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) from spindle leaf roll segments: Cost analysis for agribusiness industry. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 120: 339–350.
View at Google Scholar8.Lakshmanan, P., Geijskes, R.J., Elliott, A.R., Wang, L.F., McKeon, M.G., Swain, R.S., Borg, Z., Berding, N., Grof, C.P.L., Smith, G.R. 2002. A genotype-independent in vitro method for rapid, high frequency direct regeneration of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Proc Aust Soc for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Conf, Sydney, Australia Pos-Wed-128.
View at Google Scholar9.Miller, C.O. 1961. Kinetin relates compounds in plant growth. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 12: 395-408.
View at Google Scholar10.Oo, K.T., Htwe, M.M. and San, N.N. 2018. In vitro Regeneration of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Varieties GUI 11 and PMA 96/48. J. Sci. Innov. Res., 7: 7-11.
View at Google Scholar11.Redae, M.H. and Ambaye, T.G. 2018. In vitro propagation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) variety C86-165 through apical meristem. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 14: 228-234.
View at Google Scholar12.Sandhu, J.S., Kaur, M., Kaur, A. and Kalia, A. 2016. Single step direct transgenic plant regeneration from adventive embryos of agro-infected sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) spindle leaf roll segments with assured genetic fidelity. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 125: 149–162
View at Google Scholar13.Shah, A.H., Rashid, N., Haider, M.S., Saleem, F., Tahir, M. and Iqbal, J. 2009. An efficient short and cost effective regeneration system for transformation studies of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Pak. J. Bot., 42: 609- 614.
View at Google Scholar14.Sobhakumari, V.P. 2012. Assessment of somaclonal variation in sugarcane. African J. Biotechnol., 11: 15303-309.
View at Google Scholar15.Tesfa, M. and Ftwi, M. 2018. In Vitro Plant Regeneration of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Variety Inoculated Under Different Levels of Plant Growth Regulators. J. Plant Biochem. Physiol., 6(4).
View at Google Scholar16.Vasil, I.K., Vasil, V. 1972. Totipotency and embryogenesis in plant cell and tissue cultures. In Vitro., 8: 117–125
View at Google Scholar17.Wetherell, D.F. 1984. Enhanced adventive embryogenesis resulting from plasmolysis of cultured wild carrot cells. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 3: 221–227.
View at Google Scholar18.Zamir, R., Khalil, S.A., Shah, S.T., Khan, M.S., Ahmad, K., Shahenshah, and Ahmad, N. (2012) Efficient In vitro Regeneration of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) from bud explants. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 26: 3094-3099.
View at Google Scholar19.Zee, S.Y. 1981. Studies on adventive embryo formation in the petiole explants of coriander (Coriandrum sativum). Protoplasma, 107: 21–26.
View at Google Scholar